Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A71's 87.5 score. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 Lite is a just a little bit thicker and a little heavier phone than the Samsung Galaxy A71. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better CPU than Galaxy A71, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A71. Both of them have a screen of the same size, an equal 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same pixel density. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A71, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has an external memory card slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Samsung Galaxy A71 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A71 also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better low light images and video, a camera in the back with a lot higher 64 MP resolution and a bigger back-facing camera sensor taking better quality videos and pictures.
The Galaxy A71's battery duration is very similar to the Galaxy S10 Lite one.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.