Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-02-03 | 2018-11-15 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.40 x 3.03 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Bubblegum pink, Caviar black and Lemonade blue |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 392 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3800mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), with a global score of 89.7 against 85.2. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is newer, but a little bit heavier and a little thicker than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018). The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit faster processor than Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has a little bit more pixels per display inch, a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A9 (2018), because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for taking images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with higher video frame rates, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A9 (2018), and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1000 GB.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a bit better battery lifetime than Galaxy A9 (2018), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3800mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.