Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite has a score of 89.7, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy F62's overall score of 88.1. Galaxy S10 Lite's body is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Samsung Galaxy F62, despite of the fact that it was released about a year before. The Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy S10 Lite. Both have a screen of the same size, exactly the same 1080 x 2400 resolution and the same display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy F62 features a little bit better memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy F62 also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better performance than Galaxy F62, because it has a higher number of cores (and they are faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite and the Samsung Galaxy F62 have extremely similar cameras, because although the Samsung Galaxy F62 has slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video quality, it also counts with a back facing camera with way more megapixels, a bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a bigger aperture.
Galaxy F62 features a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has 7000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.