Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 97.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-02-03 | 2019-09-27 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.33 x 4.64 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.74 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Cosmos black and Space silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1980.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2152 x 1536 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 362 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4380mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Fold is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, getting a global score of 97.6 against 89.7. Galaxy Fold's body is noticeably heavier but thinner than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and both were released only 4 months apart. Galaxy Fold has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy Fold also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a bit more pixels per display inch. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy Fold, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for low-light images, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video definition, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality videos and pictures and a way more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy Fold has a quite bigger memory to install applications and games than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has no slot for SD memory cards, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with just a little better battery duration than Galaxy Fold, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4380mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Fold is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. So if you need that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy Fold, but if you don't you can save some money and get the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.