Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Glass and Metal | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is much better than Galaxy S10 Lite's global score of 89.7. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a heavier phone than Galaxy S10 Lite, but both are equally thin. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a little bigger screen, a better pixel density and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a better camera than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a much larger sensor which offers a way higher image and video quality, a lot more mega pixels camera, a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and video in poorly lited environments.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has as much storage for apps and games as the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, they have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB and exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite and the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra have similar batteries duration.
Although Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, letting go a few features and specs, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.