Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 79.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2015-08-13 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.03 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Gold, Gray and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass; metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | ARM Mali-T760 MP8 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.46 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 2560 x 1440 (60 fps) (Quad HD / 2K) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 336 hours standby time 22 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, with a general score of 89.7 against 79.3. The Galaxy S10 Lite body is extremely newer, but a little bit heavier and just a bit thicker than the Samsung Galaxy Note 5. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a better processor than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because it has a higher number of cores (and also faster) and a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Note 5 has a more vivid screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a higher pixels quantity per inch of display. Galaxy S10 Lite features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a much more mega-pixels back camera and better video frame rate.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a way better battery performance than Galaxy Note 5, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best devices between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.