Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-02-03 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, getting an 89.7 score against 80.4. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a notably newer device than the Galaxy Note Fan Edition, but it is a little bit thicker and heavier. The Galaxy Note Fan Edition features a slightly better screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has more RAM.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much better battery life than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy S10 Lite captures much clearer photos and videos than Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a larger camera sensor, a much better resolution camera in the back and faster video frame rate.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also very cheap compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.