Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 95.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13, 12 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2022-02-25 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 501 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1750 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 13.75 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is just a bit better than Galaxy S10 Lite's 89.7 general score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is way newer, but a little bit thicker and heavier than Galaxy S10 Lite. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a Octa-Core CPU and a 8 GB RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a better display density, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 and a bit larger display. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a bigger camera aperture for better photography in poorly lited environments, a camera in the back with way more megapixels and a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, giving up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.