Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0 |
| 2020-02-03 | -- |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.78 x 2.90 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | -- |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | -- |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 245.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Exynos 7 Octa 7420 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2100 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-T760 MP8 (650 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 8.47 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, getting a overall score of 89.7 against 80.9. Samsung Galaxy S6 Active counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a lot bigger memory to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S6 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy S6 Active counts with just a bit better performance than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S6 Active also counts with a graphics co-processor and a 64 bits processing unit.
Galaxy S10 Lite features a much better camera than Galaxy S6 Active, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for taking photographs and/or video in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor which provides a lot better photo and video quality and a back camera with lot more MP.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has longer battery duration than Galaxy S6 Active, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs a bit more money than the Galaxy S6 Active, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.