Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2020-02-03 | 2016-06-10 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.86 x 2.95 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Camo green, Sandy gold and Titanium gray |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 247.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a general score of 89.7, which is much better than the Galaxy S7 Active's score of 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a newer and thinner phone than the Galaxy S7 Active, but it's just a bit heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite has a little faster processing unit than Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy S7 Active has a brighter screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy S10 Lite has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and a slot for external memory cards that allows a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because it has a 13% more battery size. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite takes greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster 60 frames per second video frame rates and a way more mega pixels back camera.
Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more than the Samsung Galaxy S7 Active, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.