Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 8.0 Oreo, 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2020-02-03 | 2016-03-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.94 x 2.86 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black, Black pearl, Coral blue, Gold, Pink gold, Silver and White |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 336.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.56 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Galaxy S7 edge, with a overall score of 89.7 against 78.1. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a a lot newer cellphone than the Galaxy S7 edge, but it's somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker. Samsung Galaxy S7 edge features a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a better display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a little faster processor than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a larger number of cores. Galaxy S10 Lite shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S7 edge, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting images in low-light situations, and they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with faster video frame rates, a lot more megapixels camera and a bigger back camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a lot bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has more internal storage and a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with better battery lifetime than Galaxy S7 edge, because it has a 25% more battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.