Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.39 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black |
| Glass and Metal | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 421.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 Lite is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, with a general score of 89.7 against 81. The Galaxy S10 Lite is a somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter device than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, even when both were released only 0 months apart. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a little faster processor than Galaxy XCover Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover Pro counts with a display that is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's display, because although the Galaxy XCover Pro has a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel amount in each inch in the display. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking images and video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photos and a way higher (4K) video quality.
The Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a much greater memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 1000 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover Pro, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4050mAh.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S10 Lite is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.