Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 94.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.27 x 5.05 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.95 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Mystic black and Mystic bronze |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 1930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is just a bit better than the Galaxy S10 Lite, with a 94.6 score against 89.7. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 body is a lot heavier but thinner than the Galaxy S10 Lite, and both of them were released only 8 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 counts with a bit better processor than Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a screen that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite one, because although the Galaxy Z Fold 2 has a quite worse pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger display and a better resolution of 1768 x 2208px. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has a smaller aperture and a smaller sensor offering a worse image quality, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with a back camera with a much higher resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite features a greater storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy Z Fold 2, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Galaxy Z Fold 2's battery performance is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite's battery duration.
Although Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy S10 Lite, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy S10 Lite. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 2, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Galaxy S10 Lite, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.