Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 90.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2021-08-11 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 5.04 x 0.25 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 9.56 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Phantom Black, Phantom Green and Phantom Silver |
| Glass and Metal | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 7.6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2208 x 1768 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | Super AMOLED |
| 393 pixels per inch | 372 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.38 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 11.99 | 7.7 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4400mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is a little bit better than the Galaxy S10 Lite, with a general score of 90.6 against 89.7. Although the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 is noticeably heavier than the Galaxy S10 Lite, it's extremely thinner and also newer. The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 features a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 3 also has more RAM memory.
The Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit better looking display than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has a little lower 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little smaller display, it also counts with a little bit higher count of pixels in each inch in the screen. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures much better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a larger aperture and a way better 48 MP resolution camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy S10 Lite features a bit better battery life than Galaxy Z Fold 3, because it has a 2% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.