Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Sony |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2015-06-16 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 5.69 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 5.64 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Black and White |
| Glass and Metal | Glass and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 565 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 20.70 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than Xperia Z4v, having a overall score of 89.7 against 78.8. The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite construction is much newer and just a little thinner than Xperia Z4v's, although it's also heavier. Galaxy S10 Lite features a little better performance than Xperia Z4v, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 Lite also counts with more RAM memory.
Xperia Z4v features a sharper display than Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a higher quantity of pixels per inch in the display. Galaxy S10 Lite counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Xperia Z4v, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite captures better photographs and videos than Xperia Z4v, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite also has a bigger camera sensor, higher 60 fps video frame rates and a lot more MP camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite has a really longer battery performance than Xperia Z4v, because it has a 50 percent more battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite costs a little more money than the Xperia Z4v, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.