Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.7 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Xiaomi |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2020-02-03 | 2020-09-08 |
| 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.32 inches | 6.51 x 3.02 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.56 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Prism black, Prism blue and Prism white | Cobalt blue and Shadow gray |
| Glass and Metal | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 279.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.7 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED Plus | IPS LCD |
| 393 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 450 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.38 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 11.99 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5160mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is much better than the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, having an 89.7 score against 81.6. Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite is a somewhat thinner and lighter cellphone than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, even though they were released with only 7 months difference. Galaxy S10 Lite has a bit more powerful processing unit than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM.
Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite. They have a better pixel quantity in each screen inch, an equal resolution of 1080 x 2400px and a screen with the same size. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC takes slightly better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S10 Lite, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC also counts with a way higher 64 mega pixels resolution back camera, a larger aperture to take better captures and video in low light situations and a bigger sensor.
Galaxy S10 Lite counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1000 GB and more internal memory capacity. The Xiaomi Poco X3 NFC has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S10 Lite, because it has a 5160mAh battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.