Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-10-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Google Pixel 4's general score of 81.9. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a just a little bit thinner and just a little lighter cellphone than Google Pixel 4, even though both were only released 8 months apart. Google Pixel 4 counts with a processor that's very similar to the processor in Samsung Galaxy S10, and although the Google Pixel 4 has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little sharper screen than Google Pixel 4, because it has a quite larger screen, a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a just a bit more pixels per screen inch. The Galaxy S10 counts with a lot bigger memory for applications and games than Google Pixel 4, because it has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy S10 counts with a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a worse 12 MP resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, and they both have a 0.39 inches back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy S10 also counts with a larger aperture. The Galaxy S10 counts with longer battery life than Google Pixel 4, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2800mAh.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to the other ones, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.