Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2022-07-21 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is better than Google Pixel 6a, with an 88.3 score against 76.4. Although the Galaxy S10 is noticeably older than Google Pixel 6a, it's body is thinner and lighter. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S10 features a much more powerful CPU than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and 2 GB more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a better screen than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px and a higher pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a less mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to capture better low light photography and video. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games than Google Pixel 6a, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Google Pixel 6a counts with longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 30% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.