Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 82.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | -- |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2480 x 220 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 311 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Google Tensor G4 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | -- |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is slightly better than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), having a overall score of 88.3 against 82.2. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) has Android 14. The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a way better performance than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a much better display than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch of screen and a much higher resolution of 1440 x 3040. The Samsung Galaxy S10 takes slightly better photos and videos than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a lot less mega pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored), because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Google Pixel 9 Pro Fold (Rumored) counts with a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.