Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.0 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2015-03-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.69 x 2.74 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.54 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black, Gold, Gray and Pink |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 178.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 3 |
| 551 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | 64-bit ARM Cortex-A57 (Quad-Core 2000 MHz + Quad-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 430 (600 MHz) GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.99 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.12 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 20.00 MP + 4.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.80mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2840mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 391 hours standby time 25.4 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is better than HTC One M9's 77.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 body has the same weight than the HTC One M9, but it's somewhat thinner. These devices come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has a newer 11 version while HTC One M9 has Android 5.0 version.
The HTC One M9 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy S10, although it has a little smaller display, a lot lower 1920 x 1080 resolution and a quite worse screen density. The HTC One M9 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM, and they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the HTC One M9 also counts with a graphics processing unit and a 64 bits CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has much more storage capacity to install games and applications than HTC One M9, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory slot that supports up to 512 GB. Galaxy S10 counts with improved battery performance than HTC One M9, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity instead of 2840mAh.
Galaxy S10 captures slightly better pictures and videos than HTC One M9, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, a worse (4K) video quality and a way less mega-pixels back facing camera, it also counts with a lot bigger diafragm aperture to capture better captures and video in low light environments.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a lot more than the HTC One M9, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.