Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-02-21 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 551 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than HTC U Ultra, with an 88.3 score against 77. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a a little lighter phone than HTC U Ultra, but they are equally thin. The Galaxy S10 counts with a slightly better display than HTC U Ultra, because it has a quite better 1440 x 3040 resolution, a bit larger display and a little greater display pixel density.
The Galaxy S10 has just a little better performance than HTC U Ultra, because it has 4 GB more RAM and a greater number of cores. The Galaxy S10 shoots a little bit better photos and videos than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution and a 12 megapixels back-facing camera, the Galaxy S10 also counts with higher 60 frames per second video frame rate and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
The HTC U Ultra has slightly more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with just a little better battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 3400mAh battery size.
Samsung Galaxy S10 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.