Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 82.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-11-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Aurora black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 222.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than LG G8X ThinQ, getting an 88.3 score against 82.7. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has a newer 11 version while LG G8X ThinQ has Android 10, so it offers some nice extra features and improved performance. Even when the Samsung Galaxy S10 and LG G8X ThinQ were released only a few months apart, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is lighter and a bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a little more vivid screen than LG G8X ThinQ, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels number in each display inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. LG G8X ThinQ counts with much more storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the LG G8X ThinQ also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The LG G8X ThinQ's CPU is very similar to the Galaxy S10 one, and although the LG G8X ThinQ has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The LG G8X ThinQ features better battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has an 18% bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy S10 captures just a bit better photographs and videos than LG G8X ThinQ, and although they both have the same resolution camera, a 0.39 inches back camera sensor, the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 fps video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a larger aperture to take better low light captures and videos.
Samsung Galaxy S10 costs more than the LG G8X ThinQ, but it's still a great deal, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.