Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-11-23 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than LG K52, having a overall score of 88.3 against 76. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version and LG K52 has Android 10 version, offering a couple additional features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy S10's body is lighter and a little thinner than the LG K52, even though it was released about 21 months before.
The Galaxy S10 has a much better display than LG K52, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a lot higher amount of pixels per inch in the display and a much better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels. The LG K52 features a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 features a bit more powerful CPU than LG K52, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better camera than LG K52, because although it has a camera in the back with a lot worse 12 MP resolution and a lot smaller back-facing camera sensor taking lot worse quality images, it also counts with a bigger aperture to capture better photography and videos in low light environments and a way better (4K) video definition.
LG K52 counts with better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.