Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-11-27 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is better than the LG K62's 78.2 overall score. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and LG K62 has Android 10, providing you a couple nice extra features and a performance increase. The Samsung Galaxy S10 design is lighter and a little bit thinner than the LG K62, even though it was released about 21 months before.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit more powerful processor than LG K62, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM. Galaxy S10 counts with a way better display than LG K62, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a much higher screen pixels density and a much better 1440 x 3040 resolution.
The Galaxy S10 has a slightly better camera than LG K62, because although it has a much lower 12 MP resolution camera and a lot smaller camera sensor capturing way lower quality photographs and videos, it also counts with a larger aperture to capture better captures and video in poorly lited situations and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The LG K62 has much more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has an external SD slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The LG K62 counts with improved battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.