Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is much better than the LG Q70's 77.9 score. Galaxy S10 is an older phone than LG Q70, but it's a lot lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version while LG Q70 has Android 10 version.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a brighter screen than LG Q70, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040px resolution and more pixels per inch of display. The LG Q70 counts with a little bit more storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S10 features a bit superior CPU than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The LG Q70 shoots a bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture, a smaller back-facing camera sensor taking less light and dull colors and worse 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the LG Q70 also counts with a back camera with lot more MP.
LG Q70 counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Galaxy S10 not only is the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.