Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 5.1 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is better than LG V10's score of 78.6. The Galaxy S10 construction is notably newer, somewhat lighter and just a little thinner than the LG V10. These phones have Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version while LG V10 has Android 5.1. Galaxy S10 features a faster processor than LG V10, because it has more CPU cores and more RAM.
LG V10 counts with a little bit better display than Galaxy S10, although it has a little bit lower pixels density, a little smaller screen and a bit worse resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels. LG V10 captures a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller sensor taking less light and duller colors and a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photographs and videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same video definition, the LG V10 also counts with higher 120 fps video frame rate and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
LG V10 has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy S10 has a bit longer battery life than LG V10, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Samsung Galaxy S10 is also the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.