Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is slightly better than the LG V35 ThinQ, getting an 88.3 score against 81.3. Galaxy S10's construction is newer and just a little lighter, but also just a bit thicker than LG V35 ThinQ. The LG V35 ThinQ and Samsung Galaxy S10 have similar processors, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S10 features a little sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3040px, a little bit better pixels count per inch in the display and a bit bigger display. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a little bit more storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 takes clearer videos and photos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way lower resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, it also counts with a larger camera sensor and a bigger camera aperture to take better low-light photos. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better battery life than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 3% greater battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 costs a little more money than LG V35 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.