Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-10-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.25 x 2.98 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.96 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Aurora black and Moroccan blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 204.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than LG V40 ThinQ's 81.2 general score. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has a more recent 11 version while LG V40 ThinQ has Android 10 version, so it gives some nice extra features. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 and LG V40 ThinQ were released with only 5 months difference, the Samsung Galaxy S10 body is a little lighter but also a bit thicker than LG V40 ThinQ.
The LG V40 ThinQ's CPU is just as good as Galaxy S10's processor, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit better display than LG V40 ThinQ, because although it has a little worse resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a just a bit better pixels quantity per inch of display.
The LG V40 ThinQ has a slightly better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with just a bit better battery performance than LG V40 ThinQ, because it has a 3400mAh battery size against 3300mAh.
LG V40 ThinQ's camera is just as good as the Galaxy S10 one, and although the LG V40 ThinQ has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality images, they both have the same resolution back-facing camera, the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the same aperture and the same video frame rates.
Galaxy S10 costs more money than LG V40 ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.