Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-15 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.58 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Aurora gray, Aurora green, Aurora silver, Aurora white and Illusion sunset |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 264.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is slightly better than LG Velvet's 87.1 global score. The Galaxy S10 is a lighter cellphone than LG Velvet, but both are 0.31inches thick. Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit sharper screen than LG Velvet, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit better processing power than LG Velvet, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a higher amount of RAM. LG Velvet counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the LG Velvet also counts with a much higher resolution back facing camera and a way larger sensor providing a lot better image quality.
LG Velvet features a much better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the LG Velvet also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. LG Velvet features greater battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S10 is a bit more expensive than the LG Velvet, but it's still a great deal, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.