Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2022-09-08 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 2.89 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.00 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Interstellar Black and Starlight White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1250 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 200.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.82 inches (1/1.22") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 14.96 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has an overall score of 88.3, which is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra's 80.9 score. The Samsung Galaxy S10 is an way older phone than the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, but Samsung was able to build it a little thinner and notably lighter. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has an older 11 version and Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has Android 12 version.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have the same RAM memory amount, the Galaxy S10 also has a higher number of faster cores. The Galaxy S10 and the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra both have really similar screens, because although the Motorola Edge 30 Ultra has a way lower pixel density and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display.
The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not good for shooting photographs and/or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a way better video resolution, a camera with lot more mega pixels and a much larger camera sensor which gives a lot better image and video quality.
Galaxy S10 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Edge 30 Ultra, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Galaxy S10 also has a SD card slot that supports up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 30 Ultra counts with a much better battery performance than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.