Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2023-04-04 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, having a score of 88.3 against 83.4. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has older 11 version and Motorola Edge 40 Pro has Android 13. Samsung Galaxy S10's design is just a bit thinner and lighter than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, even though it was released many years before.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a much more powerful CPU than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a greater screen density and a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution.
Galaxy S10 has a little bit better storage for apps and games than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a way higher video quality, a lot bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back camera with much more megapixels.
Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a very superior battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has a 4600mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.