Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2024-04-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 2.85 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Forest Grey (Vegan Leather), Nordic Wood and Peach Fuzz (Vegan Leather) |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum, Vegan Leather and Wood |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 2500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is just a bit better than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, with an 88.3 score against 87.1. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and Motorola Edge 50 Ultra has Android 14 version. Even though Galaxy S10 is way older than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, it's design is much lighter and just a little bit thinner.
The Galaxy S10 features a much powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 50 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a bit sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a way worse amount of pixels per screen inch and a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger screen.
Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features a much greater memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory capacity. Motorola Edge 50 Ultra shoots much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Motorola Edge 50 Ultra also counts with a back-facing camera with way more MP and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting way better quality photographs.
The Motorola Edge 50 Ultra features improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.