Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-12-07 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPS |
| 551 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is a bit better than the Motorola Moto G 5G, having an 88.3 score against 81.5. Samsung Galaxy S10's body is much thinner and lighter than Motorola Moto G 5G, even though it was released around 21 months before. Both of these devices use Android OS (Operating System), but the Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while Motorola Moto G 5G has Android 10 version.
The Galaxy S10 features a more vivid screen than Moto G 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040. Galaxy S10 has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G 5G, because although it has a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 128 GB internal storage.
The Galaxy S10 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Motorola Moto G 5G, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G 5G has just a bit better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for capturing pictures or video in poorly lited situations and worse 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G 5G also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega pixels.
The Motorola Moto G 5G counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.