Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than Motorola Moto G200 5G, getting an 88.3 score against 86.2. Both phones we compare here come with the same Android 11 OS. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 is much older than the Motorola Moto G200 5G, it's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit better looking screen than Moto G200 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and a greater number of pixels per display inch.
The Moto G200 5G features a bit faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S10. They have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G200 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rate and a lot smaller aperture which is not good for taking pictures or videos in poorly lited situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Motorola Moto G200 5G also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Galaxy S10 has a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Moto G200 5G, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy S10 also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 512 GB. Moto G200 5G features a superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.