Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | -- |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the Moto G60s, having an 88.3 score against 79.9. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a extremely lighter and thinner cellphone than the Moto G60s. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system, so they should provide very similar operating system features.
Galaxy S10 has a bit better processing unit than Motorola Moto G60s, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. Galaxy S10 has a better looking screen than Moto G60s, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 and more pixels per inch of display.
Moto G60s features a slightly better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has worse 30 fps video frame rate and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for taking photos and/or video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Moto G60s also counts with a lot more MP back facing camera.
Moto G60s features a bit more storage to install applications and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Moto G60s also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1 TB. Motorola Moto G60s has a really longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.