Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-11-18 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.35 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Arctic Blue, Iron Blac and Neptune Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 660, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than Moto G71 5G, with an 88.3 score against 82.9. These phones include the same Android 11 OS. Galaxy S10 is an incredibly older phone than Moto G71 5G, but Samsung was able to make it a bit thinner and somewhat lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little more vivid screen than Moto G71 5G, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G71 5G, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a larger amount of RAM. The Moto G71 5G features just a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not nice for low-light captures and videos, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the Moto G71 5G also counts with a lot more mega pixels back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Moto G71 5G, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Moto G71 5G has a way better battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has a 47% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.