Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-08-28 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Forest green and Sapphire blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than the Moto G9 Play, having a general score of 88.3 against 76.7. Samsung Galaxy S10's construction is lighter and somewhat thinner than the Moto G9 Play, despite of the fact that it was released a bit more over a year before. These devices include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy S10 has a newer 11 version while Moto G9 Play has Android 10, giving you some extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has just a bit better performance than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 has a much more vibrant screen than Moto G9 Play, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better screen density and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels.
Moto G9 Play takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photos, and they both have the same video quality and the same 60 fps video frame rates, the Moto G9 Play also counts with a back camera with a way higher resolution and a way larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Moto G9 Play, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Motorola Moto G9 Play has a much longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.