Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, with a general score of 88.3 against 77.4. Although Samsung Galaxy S10 is newer than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, it is thicker and a little bit heavier. Galaxy S10 has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a little sharper display than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a little bit bigger screen, a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels and a quite better pixel density. Moto Z2 Force Edition has just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 has improved battery life than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 3400mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S10 takes slightly better photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and the same resolution camera, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger sensor providing a higher image quality, higher video frame rates and a much bigger diafragm aperture to capture better low light captures and videos.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy S10 is also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.