Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2017-06-29 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.15 x 3.00 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.11 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Gold, Gray and Silver |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 626 8953 Pro chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 506 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 720 x 480 (480 fps) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S10 is much better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, getting a overall score of 88.3 against 77.4. Samsung Galaxy S10 is a newer device than Motorola Moto Z2 Play, although it is a little heavier and extremely thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit faster processor than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has 4 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy S10 has a sharper display than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a way better resolution of 1440 x 3040 pixels, a better quantity of pixels per inch of display and a bit bigger screen. Motorola Moto Z2 Play features just a bit bigger memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z2 Play, because it has a 3400mAh battery size. Galaxy S10 captures a bit better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Play, and although they both have the same video resolution and a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy S10 also has faster 60 fps video frame rate and a larger aperture.
Galaxy S10 is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto Z2 Play, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a much better phone for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.