Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-08-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S10 is better than Moto Z3, with an 88.3 score against 77.6. These devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S10 has 11 version while Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie. Despite being the best in this comparison, we must highlight that it's also just a little bit heavier and thicker.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit more vivid display than Moto Z3, because it has a higher pixel number per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3040 resolution and a quite larger display. Moto Z3 counts with a little bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 counts with a little faster processor than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S10 shoots clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto Z3, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and the same resolution camera in the back, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a bigger camera sensor which gives a higher image and video quality, a lot bigger diafragm aperture and better 60 frames per second video frame rates.
The Galaxy S10 has a little longer battery duration than Moto Z3, because it has a 13% greater battery size.
Galaxy S10 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.