Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2018-06-29 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is much better than Moto Z3 Play, having a score of 88.3 against 76.3. The Galaxy S10 body is a little heavier and somewhat thicker than Moto Z3 Play. The Samsung Galaxy S10 has a bit better processor than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM.
Galaxy S10 has a more vivid screen than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution, a bit larger display and a greater pixels count per inch of screen. The Moto Z3 Play features a little bit more storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S10, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S10 features a little longer battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 3400mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Galaxy S10 captures clearer pictures and videos than Moto Z3 Play, and although they both have a 12 MP back-facing camera, a same size back camera sensor and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy S10 also has a larger camera aperture to capture better low-light captures and better video frame rate.
The Galaxy S10 is not only the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.