Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is better than the Motorola One Hyper, having a general score of 88.3 against 79.8. Both of these phones have the same Android 11 operating system. Although Galaxy S10 is older than the Motorola One Hyper, it's construction is thinner and noticeably lighter. The Galaxy S10 features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S10 also has more RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a brighter display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 3040 resolution and a better pixels quantity per inch in the screen. The Motorola One Hyper shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a lot smaller aperture and lower 30 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a much more MP back-facing camera.
Motorola One Hyper features slightly more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has an external SD slot that supports up to 1000 GB. Motorola One Hyper has superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has an 18 percent bigger battery size.
Even being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S10 is also by far the cheapest one, making this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.