Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | -- |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-05-15 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Blue and Brown |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 551 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a score of 88.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Vision's global score of 80.7. The Galaxy S10 is a a little thinner and lighter phone than Motorola One Vision, even though both of them were released with only 2 months difference. Galaxy S10 has a little more vivid display than Motorola One Vision, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM. The Motorola One Vision features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low light images and videos and lower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing lot better quality photographs.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 and the Motorola One Vision have very similar storage for games and applications, they have a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity. The Motorola One Vision has a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has a 3500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.