Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 15 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2025-04-24 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | -- |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | -- |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 551 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.36 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 global score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS, but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version and Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15 version. The Galaxy S10 counts with a lot better processing power than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 8 GB lesser RAM, they both have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy S10 features a much better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a superior camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way better video definition and a back camera with way more megapixels.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 512 GB internal memory. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.