Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-10-16 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Cyber shade |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having an 88.3 score against 75.8. Even when Galaxy S10 and the nubia Red Magic 3S were released with only 7 months difference, Galaxy S10 is lighter and thinner. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S10 has 11 version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie.
Galaxy S10 counts with a bit better looking display than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 3040 pixels resolution and a greater display density. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a little faster CPU than Galaxy S10, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in low-light situations, it also counts with a much larger back camera sensor taking lot better quality pictures and videos, a much better 7680x4320 video definition and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with slightly more memory capacity to store more games and applications than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3400mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S10 is also a lot cheaper, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.