Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-05-14 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Ocean |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 has a global score of 88.3, which is a bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro's 83.1 overall score. The Galaxy S10 body is a lot lighter and thinner than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, even though it was released just a bit over a year before. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S10 has the newer 11 version and OPPO Find X2 Pro has Android 10 version, so it gives you some extra features.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro features a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy S10, because although it has a just a little worse screen pixels density, it also counts with a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3168 and a quite bigger screen.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a superior camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or videos in low-light environments, and they both have the same (4K) video definition and the same 60 frames per second video frame rates, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also counts with a back camera with a much better 48 mega pixels resolution and a much larger camera sensor providing a way higher image quality.
OPPO Find X2 Pro has a much better memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy S10, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity. The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy S10, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.