Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2023-12-11 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 has a general score of 88.3, which is better than Galaxy A25 5G's score of 79.9. Both phones in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S10 has the older 11 version and Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version. The Galaxy S10 body is a bit thinner and much lighter than the Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released 5 years before.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has a way better processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S10 has a bit better looking display than Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier sensor capturing lower quality videos and pictures, a tinier aperture and slower 30 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a much better resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G counts with a slightly better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S10, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features a way better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3400mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.