Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2020-04-27 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.23 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S10 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A31, having an 88.3 score against 81.3. These devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy S10 has newer 11 version while Samsung Galaxy A31 has Android 10 version. Despite of the fact that Galaxy S10 is older than Samsung Galaxy A31, it's construction is somewhat lighter and a bit thinner.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A31, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has more RAM. Galaxy S10 has a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel quantity per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
The Samsung Galaxy A31 captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Galaxy S10, because although it has lower video frame rates and a lot smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition, the Samsung Galaxy A31 also counts with a way better resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor.
The Galaxy S10 has much more memory capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy A31, and although they both have a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy S10 also has 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy A31 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy S10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.