Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2019-12-27 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S10 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A51, getting a global score of 88.3 against 85.5. The Galaxy S10 design has the same thickness than the Samsung Galaxy A51, but it's a little lighter. Both of these phones work with the same Android 11 OS, so both should provide the same operating system features.
Samsung Galaxy S10 has just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy A51, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S10 counts with a little more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy A51, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch in the display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 3040px.
Galaxy A51 has a better camera than Galaxy S10, because although it has worse video frame rates and a way tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, the Galaxy A51 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and videos and a lot more MP back facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy A51's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Galaxy S10 one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal memory and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A51 counts with greater battery life than Galaxy S10, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S10 is also cheaper than the Galaxy A51, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.