Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 88.3 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-08 | 2021-03-19 |
| 5.90 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.54 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Flamingo pink, Prism black, Prism blue, Prism green and Prism white | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 281.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3040 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 551 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 640 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3400mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.36 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A52 5G has a global score of 91.3, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy S10's general score of 88.3. Both devices we compare here have Android operating system, but Galaxy A52 5G has 12 version and Samsung Galaxy S10 has Android 11. The Galaxy A52 5G design is notably newer, but a little thicker and heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S10.
Samsung Galaxy S10 features just a little better performance than Galaxy A52 5G, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S10 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S10 features a bit better display than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per screen inch and a better resolution of 1440 x 3040.
The Galaxy A52 5G captures much better videos and photos than Galaxy S10, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture and lower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a way higher resolution camera in the back and a lot larger back camera sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality.
Galaxy A52 5G counts with a slightly better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy S10, and although they both have the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has an external memory card slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A52 5G counts with greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy S10, because it has a 32% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.